Reading
through the editorial piece, I can only feel for what the speaker is talking
about. The speaker is so angry at the
current state of the economy despite the fact that everybody, including the President
and governors, postulating the negative effects of the matter to citizens.
There is basically some truth about what the speaker posits in regards to who
the minimum wage greatly affects. In fact, it is posited that the citizens,
have for a longer period of time, failed to comprehend that minimum wages
affects the older people as opposed to teenage workers.
Another
important argument that the speaker puts across relates to the manner for which
the level of minimum wage has continued to remain at a low despite a relative
increase in the level of living expenses.Firsthand life experience of the speaker ascertains the fact that the
current American economy cannot allow one to live alone and afford to a comfortable
lifestyle. This is because they are forced to seek the comfort of life by
living with roommates as a way of sharing costs attributed to leading a
relative comfortable life.
In
my opinion, it is ironical that the country’s political figures are leading a
fore-front public campaign aimed at sensitizing people about the need for
raising the current minimum wage of $8 an hour instead of concentrating on the
formulation of policies that can help improve the condition. The reality of the
matter is that the affluent population seems to be leading a comfortable
lifestyle at the expense of the struggling economy. It is also ironical that a person would need a
degree or a learned trade in order to secure a fair-paying job despite the fact
that school seems to have shifted to a luxurious service category in the United
States of America. Thus, I think that the speaker is very certain on his
arguments in regards to the way the economy is operating to oppress the
struggling class of the society.
No comments:
Post a Comment